Monday, April 8, 2013

Freud's Pansexuality

I am sure this concept outlined in Freud's theory of human nature has received an overwhelming amount of attention. (It was the first topic of class discussion today) I am referring to Pansexuality- the belief that everything in life is caused by our sexual instincts.  There is an undeniable presence in modern culture of sexual innuendos, images, and blatant depictions that cause a physical and mental arousal (arousal can be dually defined in this statement) that play on our overt and suppressed desires.  I have heard arguments that attempt to explain the cause of war; asserting and securing ones masculinity. Furthermore, guns stand as phallic symbols and when used in conjunction with the source of conflict (preserving masculinity and enacting dominance) serve as a visual representation of a man holding his penis.
What are the indications that relate to historical examples? There are cave drawings and Greek statues that blatantly refer to sexual matters.   Can we then say that the genesis of man is due to sexual contact and that we exist to perpetuate the cycle and that all other aspects of life are generated by our basic needs?

How does the concept of Pansexuality relate to those select few who have renounced sexual encounters all together- to focus on intellectual or relational strength as opposed to coital measures?

No comments:

Post a Comment