Continuing Freud- More Personal/Biased/Judgemental Views of Mine

I had one more issue I wanted to evaluate in regard to Pansexuality: Are "sexual revolutions" just an acknowledgment of a person's innate design? How is a woman's psychology generated on the premise that sexuality determines her actions, and furthermore how much of her psychological stability is truly affected by restrictions to her sexual freedom from cultural influences?  I read in a sociology paper once that by biological design women are restricted in number of sexual partners due to the length of gestation and lactation; whereas men are naturally more able to procreate rather quickly.  The bonds females form with their offspring is deeper due to the length, requirements, and experiences of pregnancy and men, while the understand a responsibility to their offspring cannot identify to the same degree with their child.  I have heard men say "I want to spread my seed" "Have a lot of babies", etc.  Have you ever heard a woman say "I want to have as many children as I physically can with as many men as I can"? Certainly not.  Some people do ascribe to this lifestyle, but I am not sure it is a result of their conscious decision, maybe just a compromise in their morals or promiscuous lifestyle. (I apologize for being judgmental, I have a daughter and have a very strong relationship with her father that we both intend to continue throughout our lives; based on our mutual belief that a strong family structure is crucial to human development and well being) I cannot understand men or women who procreate with multiple people- their actions seems reckless without any consideration for the impact it will have on the lives they create. Another issue that could be analyzed is polygamy.  What are your feelings about the polygamist lifestyle in regards to physical, mental, and emotional stability of the parties involved? (including the man, the women, and the offspring).