Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Response To Devin's Post "Fear of Marxism"

I am responding to Devin Philbrick's post "Fear of Marxism" where he examines the origins of cultural fear in Karl Marx's doctrines. I will only offer my short opinion; as I feel inferior in argument to you.  I am strictly offering my opinion based on my personal experience, and while I will apply the overall impression to the masses I do not defend my convictions to others.  When I was growing up "Marxism" was always used with a derogatory connotation.  As a child my assimilation into the ideas of Marxism only went as far as the historical relation to the Soviet Union.  As far as opposition to his distinct ideals; I would say it is naivety as a result of cultural fear imparted on us at a young age. (whether intentional or unintentional I am not apt to say).  It is always easier to accept a simple concept (such as Marxism = Soviet Union/Communism/Negativity) as opposed to truly exploring what  aspects of the concept lead the group to their practices (as no person or enterprise fully adheres to any set concept)

Another Class-Influenced Thought Experiment

My narrative on the next class discussion will incorporate a more social foundation, one constructed on experiencing Western customs and not necessarily grounded on historical or biblical accuracy.  We discussed consumerism and its role in inhibiting change over time.  This forced me to examine our cultural practices regarding certain holiday celebrations.  Regarding Christmas and Easter, both religiously based concepts, they have both transformed into an industry based on consumerism- separate (for the masses at least) from adherence to religious parameters.  The industry that Christmas has created will only expand or grow exponentially in our culture due to consumerism.  Consumerism has even pervaded the minute religious facets that still remain in these practices.  There are products produced with depictions of religious figures, which appeal to the few that respect the holidays origin- and compel them to purchase the item in a demonstration of their support.  A more obscure example is the production of Christmas flowers (poinsettias).  As with all other industry led production; the seasonal availability of certain items are regulated to maximize profit.  The flowers are mass produced during the corresponding occasion with the intent to generate excessive monetary return.  Easter is also commercially driven; I honestly cannot begin to cite all the examples of the perversion that Western society has imposed with commercialism and consumerism on all aspects of personal conviction or practice.  The statement is true- consumerism does inhibit change over time.  How are we to develop or transform our culture if we are constantly fed products that are marketed to appeal to us, and are determined by an industry not by individual preference.

Influenced by Class Discussion Relating to Marxism

Admittedly, I am unsure of the exact relation of this next concept to Marxism. We touched on the concept of using process to improve yourself (such as forcing yourself to smile), but where it falls in relation to category of this concept is unclear.  I do want to explore the power of self enterprise in changing ones current circumstance.  A few questions are raised when I consider the capabilities of such a practice; Is the impact of psychological betterment universal to all humans? What contributory factors impact the capacity for said betterment? (wealth, health, any variation regarding sex, ethnicity) Also where does modern medicine for depression or anxiety exist in this idea?  Furthermore- explore the basis and practice for the placebo effect. Is using psychology a personally motivated placebo? Is a placebo founded on being unaware of the lack of assistance? 
There does seem to be one instance in which the will to increase emotional or physical well being is successful.  Through the power of prayer many find that their demeanor is affected and they have an improved outlook.  Is this due to the "spiritual healers", God, pastors, preachers, televangelists? Or are we solely responsible for taking outside influences and internalizing them to our own betterment?